Origin THC and destination THC
Every container passes through two terminals, and each charges for its handling. Origin THC covers receiving the container, yard storage within free time, and loading it aboard; destination THC covers discharge, yard handling, and release at the far end. The amounts are set by the terminal (and passed through by the carrier), so they vary widely by port and are quoted as fixed per-container local charges rather than as part of the sea rate.
Because THC sits outside the base ocean freight, it is one of the line items that makes 'cheap freight' misleading. A carrier can advertise a low ocean rate and recover margin through high local THC — which is exactly the mechanism behind inflated destination charges on some CIF imports, where the buyer discovers the 'seller pays freight' deal still leaves them a hefty destination THC bill.
Who pays, and why it causes disputes
In principle THC follows the Incoterm and the prepaid/collect split: the party controlling each leg bears that terminal's charge. In practice, port-local billing conventions and carrier policies muddy it, and origin/destination THC allocation is one of the most argued items in forwarding. The safe move is to quote origin THC, ocean freight, and destination THC as explicit separate lines so nobody is surprised — vague 'all-in' numbers that quietly bury or omit THC are how quotes get disputed after the cargo has moved.
For buyers evaluating a CIF offer, the discipline is to ask for destination charges up front and compare the true landed cost, not the seller's freight. THC transparency is a small thing that signals a professional forwarder — and, conversely, opaque local charges are a reliable red flag.

